Cases 31 - 40 of 343
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 23-5087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DORSEY, BOP Officer and UNKNOWN SUPERIOR OFFICERS
Block v. Fikes et al
as 0:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
J Fikes, Acting Warden, Amy Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Boncher et al
as 1:2023cv10141
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
Amy Boncher, Sincada, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen v. Hightower et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Warden Hightower, Dr. Rabinowitz, HSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tatar v. Griffin et al
as 2:2023cv02023
Defendant:
CMC Johnson, STA Zebtaski, Edu Officer (F/N/U) Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Serdar Tatar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont
as 23-40002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Prigmore
Defendant / Appellee:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Gorbey v. United States, et al
as 22-3273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Director, JUDGE JAMES P. O'HARA and others
Patterson v. Garza et al
as 3:2022cv02678
Plaintiff:
Jayleen Patterson
Defendant:
P Garza and BOP Seagoville FCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Dinkins v. USA, et al
as 22-56096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT O. DINKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USP LOMPOC MEDICAL DR., HOSPITAL DR and others
Gorbey v. United States, et al
as 22-3260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Director, JUDGE JAMES P. O'HARA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
