Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin , C. Dykes , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. Lester et al
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terence Barry
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jim Dickman and Michael White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Huggins et al
as 3:2013cv00215
Defendant:
D. Huggins , M. Powe , R. Rice and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. Lester et al
as 2:2012cv03060
Plaintiff:
Terence Barry
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jim Dickman and Michael White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Western New Mexico Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv00915
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Western New Mexico Correctional Facility, New Mexico Corrections Department, Melissa Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckett v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Alvin Luckett, Jr
Defendant:
Chris Epps, E L Sparkman, Michael White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White vs. Polk County, et al.
as 8:2012cv00874
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Polk County and Polk County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brockington v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al
as 6:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
Eddie David Brockington
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners Inc , Aiken County, Aiken County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Mosley et al
as 4:2011cv01606
Plaintiff:
Christopher Franklin
Defendant:
Charles L. Mosley, Jeremiah W. Nixon, George A. Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
