Cases 41 - 50 of 19,937
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Williams-Dorsey v. County of Chenango et al
as 9:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Davonte Williams-Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Chenango, Chenango County Sheriff's Office, Chenango County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burnett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cortney Perry
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04612
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Hang Chen, Emily Hui Chen-Liang, Susana Chong Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dinh v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Truong Jason Dinh
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Levesque v. Storie et al
as 4:2024cv40083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Gregory P Storie, Letitia James, Julia Kaplan Toce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant:
STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
