Cases 41 - 50 of 332
Denrick Brown v. David Robinson
as 21-7755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Deputy Director, KAREN STAPLETON, Disciplinary Appeal Unit Manager, CHRISTOPHER J. GENSINGER, CCB Manager and others
Severson v. Massielo et al
as 6:2021cv06680
Plaintiff:
Trisha N. Severson
Defendant:
C. Massielo, Caleb Cutting, Matthew K. Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Officer Reiter et al
as 4:2021cv04179
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Defendant:
Officer Reiter, Office Bobier, Colleen Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Butler v. Gonzales-Moran
as 1:2021cv01524
Plaintiff:
Anthony Butler
Defendant:
R. Gonzales-Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOBY v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY DRUG COURT PROBATION et al
as 3:2021cv17222
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. DOBY
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DRUG COURT PROBATION, JUDGE ROBERT JONES, AKEESHA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farnsworth v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Leo Brandon Farnsworth
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, Harold W. Clarke, Ralph Shearer Northam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Grand Forks Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Moran
Defendant:
Grand Forks Police Department, Brandon Bozlerski and Brandon Bochenski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Gorham et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Moran
Defendant:
Rhiannon Gorham and Grand Forks District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01450
Plaintiff:
Damon R Johnson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Moran, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Leonard Sapp
Defendant:
Warden Sprayberry, Cert. Officer Willie and Cert Officer Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
