Cases 41 - 50 of 182
Evans v. Lovell et al
as 7:2020cv00434
Defendant:
B. Walls, A. Kilbourne, Ms. D. Swann and others
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. Bal et al
as 2:2019cv01971
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of the Ombudsman, Julie Shattuck, Sirrea Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. West et al
as 2:2019cv01507
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Areig Awad, Brittany West and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Allen and Joseph Michael Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sibley v. Mullins et al
as 7:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Regional Ombudsman, J. Messer, Jeff Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Eugene Sibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 5:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Terri Hall, Jane Doe, Rachel Smalling and others
Plaintiff:
Darion L. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Davis et al
as 2:2018cv00143
Defendant:
Barbara Sapp, Unnamed Ombudsman, Charles Horsely and others
Plaintiff:
Earl King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner Bey v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00119
Petitioner:
Akeem Turner Bey
Defendant:
Mr Neal, Mr Newkirk, Mr Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Carter, Jr. v. Tracy S. Ray
as 18-6151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY S. RAY, Warden, A. MACK BAILEY, Assistant Warden, TERESA L. BRICKHEAD, Operation Manager and others
Jeremy Mundine v. Dorthy Kirschvick, et al
as 17-20763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY MUNDINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DORTHY W. KIRSCHVICK, CURTIS BRIDGES, BENITO MOYA and others
David Moore v. King County Jail, et al
as 17-35971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY JAIL, and entities, SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, KING COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
