Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Sitton v. LVMPD et al
as 2:2017cv00111
Defendant:
CCS Baker, Bean, Billingsley and others
Plaintiff:
Will Sitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Corizon Medical et al
as 3:2016cv03298
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, FBI Director (f/n/u) Comey, Jeb Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connolly v. Beeson et al
as 6:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Bryson Patrick Connolly
Defendant:
Myron Beeson, Leroy Kirkegard, Kristy Cobbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Mitchell v. Snowden, et al
as 16-16848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SNOWDEN, S. VANCE, LARIOS and others
Lewis et al v. Secret Service et al
as 3:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis, F.B.I., Barack Obama and others
Defendant:
Secret Service, U.S. Homeland Security, Bruce Rauner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lewis v. Does et al
as 3:2016cv03242
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Bruce Rauner, Edward Snowden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrew Patterson, III v. Doe, et al
as 16-3289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew Patterson, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Doe, Katherine, Apartment Complex Manager, Heritage House, Albert Gentry, maintenance person, Heritage House, Beverly Snowden, Administrator, North Little Rock Housing Authority and others
Patterson v. Doe et al
as 4:2016cv00148
Plaintiff:
Andrew Patterson, III
Defendant:
Doe, Albert Gentry, Beverly Snowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. SNOWDEN et al
as 3:2015cv04270
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE H. SNOWDEN, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and LONG BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Snowden et al
as 2:2015cv01167
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Snowden, Vance, Larios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
