Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Niederstadt v. Wolf et al
as 2:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Charles A Niederstadt
Defendant:
FNU Wolf, FNU Lackey, John Hreburt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banargent v. Schultz-LacKey
as 7:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Banargent
Defendant:
Sarah Schultz-LacKey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Drago et al
as 1:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Travis Mandell Kemp
Defendant:
Paul C Drago, Cecilia Reynolds, Jeanna McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Lackey v. Stephen Hurt, Sr., et al
as 12-40461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LACKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN HURT, Sr., Medical Practice Manager, W. TURNER, Nurse, Beto Unit and J. BECRAFT, Law Library Supervisor
LACKEY v. PETTY et al
as 3:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
JAMES E LACKEY, JR
Defendant:
MICHAEL PETTY and SCOTT C SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Brown v. Sydney Lackey
as 11-7269
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
SYDNEY JEROME LACKEY, Vice Narcotics Detective, CHARLIE T. DAVIS, Vice Narcotics Detective, LUKE J. DONAHUE, Vice Narcotic Police and others
Brown v. Lackey et al
as 3:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
William Arthur Brown
Respondent:
Sydney Jerome Lackey, Charlie T. Davis, Luke J. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. Hurt et al
as 6:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Lackey
Defendant:
Stephen Hurt, Sr, W Turner and J BeCraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv00640
Defendant:
Amand Akwon, David Ankerbran, Unknown Ard and others
Plaintiff:
Kermit Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees et al
as 2:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
David L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees, Brad Livingston, Brian Rodeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
