Cases 51 - 60 of 2,680
Bell v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bailey, Williams and Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. White Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
White Castle, Bank of America, Sparks Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEST v. D'ANGELO et al
as 1:2024cv04363
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. WEST, JR.
Defendant:
TPR J. D'ANGELO, DSFC G. WREN, DET II M. RIBCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Divenuti et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bein Divenuti, Martin and Landy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moussa Diarra v. Bell, et al
as 24-10944
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NRA DIARRA
Defendant:
BELL, HOOD and DEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF
Bell v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Moore, Hirst, Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Vega
as 24-50190
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradley Young
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Vega, FNU Decker, RN Health Safety Administrator, FNU Mitchel, Burse and others
Chambers v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Vincel Chambers
Defendant:
St. Louis County, 21st Judicial Circuit Court and Wesley Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
