Cases 51 - 60 of 375,442
King v. Alonzo
as 1:2024cv01460
Plaintiff:
Kyeem King
Defendant:
Fateema Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Robert Gary Moore
Defendant:
Ronald Weber, Lark and Commissioner of Correctional Division of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Defendant:
Harford County Government, Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler and Warden Daniel Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Reese et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Arnold Eaton
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Colette Peters, All Former Directors of The Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Quinten Lovell Brown
Defendant:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diez v. TDCJ
as 24-40350
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, McConnell Unit Mailroom Supervisor Ms. Salles, McConnell Unit Unknown Mailroom Staff and others
Turner v. Prince
as 6:2024cv06070
Plaintiff:
Henry Darnell Turner
Defendant:
Brandy Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
