Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Lowrey v. Barrow County et al
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Lowrey
Defendant:
Barrow County, Wrap Restraint Co, Correct Health Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Richard Taylor v. Leslie Woods, et al
as 09-40234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD OWEN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE WOODS, KEVIN MOORE, MICHAEL W SIZEMORE and others
Unruh v. Moore, et al
as 08-40750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL S UNRUH
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN MOORE, MICHAEL SIZEMORE, ETHAN WESTFALL and others
Wright v. Westfall
as 4:2008cv00356
Plaintiff:
Issac Wright
Defendant:
Mollee Westfall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Myles et al
as 2:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Neil Williams
Defendant:
Richard Myles, Correctional Medical Services, C.M.S. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthew Silva v. Sara Olson, et al
as 08-15620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW G. SILVA
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA OLSON, JAMES C. MILLER, WILLIAM LUCAS and others
Paul Jeffreys, et al v. Burlington County Jail
as 08-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL JEFFREYS
Plaintiff:
BURLINGTON CTY JAIL, EVANS, Doctor, JOEL E. COLE and others
Thomas v. Westfall et al
as 2:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Terry Thomas
Defendant:
Mary Westfall, David Miller, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kenny Sayre, Sr. v. Thomas McBride
as 08-6319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNY DREW SAYRE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, Mt. Olive, West Virginia and MARY WESTFALL, of C-M-S-AS-H.S.A., Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, Mt. Olive, West Virginia
Green v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2007cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jack Green
Defendant:
James Rubenstein, Thomas McBride, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
