Cases 71 - 80 of 2,693
Debellis v. Sanchez
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Anthony Debellis
Defendant:
Alexander Sanchez, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jonny Reyes-Martinez v. Jason Woosley
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
JONNY ALEXANDER REYES MARTINEZ and JONNY ALEXANDER REYES-MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JASON WOOSLEY
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Green Haven Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Green Haven Correctional Facility, Superintendent Miller and ORC A. Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 5:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 23-2077
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, DR. NIKHIL MATHEWS, CITY OF BOSTON and others
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUMBUL SIDDIQUI, Mayor, CHRISTINE ELOW and others
Finch v. Kilgore et al
as 7:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Matthew Finch
Defendant:
Major Kilgore, Todd Tatum, Lt. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamrick v. Knapp
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Hamrick
Defendant:
Hampton Alexander Knapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
