Cases 1 - 10 of 1,944
Dingle v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. DeBouse
as 24-10431
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Meeks, III
Defendant:
Alvin DeBouse, FNU LNU, Chief Probation Officer, John Doe Task Force and others
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Jones v. Heun
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones and Abdul Haseeb Ibu Jones Bey
Defendant:
Arthur "Art" Heun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Arthur Fisher v FNU Whitley, et al
as 6:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Arthur Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Whitley and Jeff Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Walker (PS) v. Lankford et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Arthur Walker
Defendant:
Lankford, Beeler and Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
