Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Telly Bristol v. Olinger
as 24-6322
Plaintiff:
TELLY SAVALAS BRISTOL
Defendant:
NURSE PRACTITIONER OLINGER, DR. HAYNES, Psych Senior, BATEMAN, Assistant Warden and others
Davis v. Edery et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Defendant:
Abner Edery, Viviane Edery, Virginie Edery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Lexington Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Abner J. Knox
Respondent:
Lexington Police Department, Officer Hundley and Officer Haggerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Davis v. Edery et al
as 3:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Davis
Defendant:
Abner Edery, Viviane Edery, Alexandra Edery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demos v. Moreno et al
as 3:2023cv05603
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr and Abner Edras Maiominides
Defendant:
M Moreno, Robert Jackson, Daniel Bayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Abner Et al
as 0:2023cv61099
Plaintiff:
Hataria Whitehead
Defendant:
Davis Abner and Nancy J Cotterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bristol v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Telly Savalas Bristol
Defendant:
David Anderson, Dr. Olinger, Dr. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Defendant:
Latoyia Carpenter, Wesley Leatham, J Douglas Overbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abner Rochelien v. D. Padgett
as 22-13041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABNER ROCHELIEN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. PADGETT, Captain
ABNER v. BURGESS
as 1:2022cv02041
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SHANNON ABNER
Defendant:
MARILYN BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
