Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Moore v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Richard Kareem Moore
Defendant:
Solicitor: Elizabeth B. Young and Head Public Defender: DeGrant Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald McCray v. IRS, et al
as 23-2602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald McCray
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service and Jerome B. Young
McCray v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Jerome B. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alucious Williams, Jr. v. Captain Gilbert
as 23-6028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN GILBERT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OSBORN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. CLIFTON and others
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Unnamed, Lt. G. Adams, B. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovings v. Court and Legal Department et al
as 7:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Offender Management Services, Court and Legal Department, Charnelle Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Lovings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Baker et al
as 7:2019cv00711
Defendant:
A. Rivero, J. Hounshell, A. Vanhuss and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
