Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Nepton v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2023cv61388
Plaintiff:
Javier Isaac Nepton
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff's Office, Robert Rausch and Major Angelo Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stawicki v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stawicki and IGGY
Defendant:
Ken Wade, Tim Weed, Trever Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno v. J. Ridenour
as 22-7119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAZARO QUINONES-CEDENO
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. J. RIDENOUR, Education specialist, M. B. ANTONELLI, FCC Warden, PAUL ADAMS, FCI Warden and others
Cedeno v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Tabatha Alvarez and Elain C. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran v. Grelick, et al
as 22-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES J. DURAN, AKA James Joseph Duran
Defendant / Appellee:
GRELICK, Warden, DENHAM, Warden, MCCLINTOCK, Warden and others
Cedeno v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Stuart A Friedman, Ronnie Ducoff, Timothy J. McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Cedeno
as 6:2021cv01403
Plaintiff:
Steven Sean Jackson
Defendant:
Alexandra Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedeno v. Ohio Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2020cv02659
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Ohio Attorney General Office and Mary Anne Reese
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
