Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jaber v. Ray et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
Warden Ray, Acting Warden Brown, Officer Titlle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harper v. Segal et al
as 0:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harper
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal, Susan Brown, Associate Warden Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreland, Samuel v. Bryant et al
as 3:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moreland
Defendant:
Warden Office Bryant, Dr. Landers, Dr. Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ha v. Gulick et al
as 2:2020cv01785
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Adam Reynolds, John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Ha and Thomas Ha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando v. N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 9:2019cv01183
Defendant:
Dr. Adams, N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S., Nurse Practioner Mrs. Calley and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Orlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitelaw v. Anderson et al
as 2:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Dr Horton, John Does, Dr Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Marquitos Maurice Whitelaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Justice v. Warden Harris, et al
as 17-41093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BARNARD JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN HARRIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCKINNEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEBEAU and others
Randolph v. New York State et al
as 9:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Randolph
Defendant:
New York State and Dr. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney v. N.Y.S. D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 9:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Richard Kearney
Defendant:
Dr. Adams, R. Noelting, S. Muller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafonzo R Turner v. Matthew Cates et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Defendant:
Dr Adams, California Correctional Health Care Services, Warden Brenda M. Cash and others
Plaintiff:
Lafonso R Turner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
