Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas-El v. Alfero et al
as 4:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Unknown Parker, J. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Thomas-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2019cv04797
Defendant:
ALY WILLIAMS, ARIANNA J. FREEMAN, DAVID W. BARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
MR. JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inmates of St Joe County et al v. Lawson
as 3:2019cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Winters, Robin Dale Kilgore Peppers, S Ortiz-R and others
Defendant:
Julie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peppers et al v. Lawson et al
as 3:2019cv00206
Plaintiff:
Robin Dale Kilgore Peppers, Kenneth Eugene Stroder, III, William James Freeman and others
Defendant:
Aramark and Julie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2019cv00304
Defendant:
J. Freeman, Dr. Brookhart, Michael S Deimel and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick H Ingram, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Ahmed et al
as 2:2019cv02062
Defendant:
Dr. Brookhart, Michael S Deimel, Dr. F Ahmed and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick H Ingram, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bizzell v. Freeman et al
as 6:2017cv01528
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Bizzell, Jr.
Defendant:
Basil J. Freeman and Gregory J. Konieczka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerena et al v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Gerena, Richard Pellegrino, Donald Brusso and others
Defendant:
Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Donna Hall, Naomi J. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2012cv01117
Plaintiff:
David Ellis
Defendant:
Michael Phillips, J Freeman and Carla Payne Wendborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
