Cases 1 - 10 of 922
Staffney v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11678
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Robert A. Benson, David G. Kamm and others
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan, Robert Lewis v. Osborne
as 1:2024cv21668
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Morgan and Robert Lewis Morgan Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Kent Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Defendant:
Jevon Bowman, C. Alexander, James Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Baumgartner et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Karl Baumgartner, Campbell, Krina Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kroemer v. County of Ontario, New York State
as 6:2024cv06323
Plaintiff:
Kent A. Kroemer, .
Defendant:
County of Ontario, New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02603
Plaintiff:
Kent Adams
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
