Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cody Howard v. Keefe Company, et al
as 23-1477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
Keefe Company, Commissary Provider and Does, Pulaski County Commissary Personnel
Howard v. Keefe Company et al
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Cody S Howard
Defendant:
Keefe Company and Does Pulaski County Commissary Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORTON v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01562
Plaintiff:
KEAON HORTON
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID KELSEY and KEEFE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Keefe Company
as 3:2016cv01119
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Clark
Defendant:
Keefe Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2015cv01176
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
P. Hendrix, Corizon Health Inc., Christine Armenta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cory Bradley v. Keefe Company, et al
as 15-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cory Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Keefe Company, Keefe Commissary Network, Keefe Group and others
Bradley v. Keefe Company et al
as 4:2014cv02087
Plaintiff:
Cory Bradley
Defendant:
Keefe Company, Keefe Commissary Network, Keefe Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed-Bey v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv13616
Plaintiff:
Mark Reed-Bey
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Keefe Company
Cruthird v. Keefe Commissary Network, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv12406
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M. Cruthird
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Keefe Commissary Network and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
