Cases 1 - 9 of 9
White v. State of Texas et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Defendant:
Officer CO4 Sheets, State of Texas, James Allred, Jr. Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Arnold White, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahaffey v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04080
Plaintiff:
Kent Mahaffey
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahaffey v. Nance et al
as 4:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Mail Room Clerk Crouder and A/W Nance
Plaintiff:
Michael Mahaffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahaffey v. Buskirk et al
as 2:2013cv14646
Plaintiff:
Mark Mahaffey
Defendant:
Jashua Buskirk, Susan B McCauley, Charles Turner and others
Ernest Newman v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, et al
as 09-20473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST D NEWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, KEVIN MAFIELD, TDCJ-CID Region I Director, A. CASTILLO, Senior Warden and others
Newman v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv02024
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dale Newman
Defendant:
Nathan Quarterman, Kevin Mafield, A. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahaffey v. Studdard et al
as 1:2008cv01831
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rich Mahaffey
Defendant:
Jerry Studdard, Talladega County Commissioners, Ken Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shupe v. Wyoming Department of Correcti, et al
as 07-8087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD DAVID SHUPE, JR.
Plaintiff:
RANDY DEAN MORGANFLASH
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and individually and others
Smith v. Ward et al
as 5:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Ron Ward, Lenora Jordan, Bill Monday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
