Cases 1 - 10 of 760
Diaz v. Hendricks et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Omar Diaz, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristin K. Hendricks, John O'Connor, Erin Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abercrumble v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shelton Abercrumble
Defendant:
Warden Bass, Lt Smith and CO Scout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shelton v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David L. Shelton
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Shelton v. Hyde County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2024ct03020
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Hyde County Sheriff's Department, Carl M. Cahoon, Stacey Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
