Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hall v. United States
as 1:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Bedford County Jail (JTS)
as 4:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Timothy Hall
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cryer v. MA Department of Correction, et al
as 13-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Interested Party:
JOHN DIAZ
Hall v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 1:2012cv01484
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cryer v. MA Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER DEREK SINCERE BLACK WOLF CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Lamar Timothy Hall v. Hon. Sam Ohta et al
as 2:2011cv00031
Defendant:
Shamsul Alam, Shamsul Alam, Officer Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Timothy Hall
Hall v. Everglades Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv24219
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
Everglades Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. M.
as 1:2010cv24179
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
Krajnik M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Okeechobee Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2010cv14266
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
Okeechobee Correctional Institution, South Florida Reception Center, Department of Correction Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Okeechobee Correctional Medical Department et al
as 2:2010cv14131
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
Okeechobee Correctional Medical Department, South Florida Reception Center, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
