Cases 1 - 10 of 797
Michael Grace v. Alamance County
as 24-6538
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GRACE
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY, GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CROSS and others
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
CRUZ v. DONDON et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ CRUZ
Defendant:
DONDON, M WILLIAMS, SHEREA GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pauley v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pauley
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Cross, Crokett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lairson v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Eric Lairson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. USA
as 4:2024cv00476
Petitioner:
Timothy Cross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gilali, Yousef v. La Crosse County et al
as 3:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Yousef Gilali
Defendant:
La Crosse County, La Crosse County Jail, La Crosse Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Binns
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rickey W. Cross
Defendant:
FNU Binns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
