Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frey v. Centurion Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jacob Spencer Frey
Defendant:
Centurion Health, Inc., Centurion of Idaho LLC, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Young, et al.
as 1:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
Daniel Stinson
Respondent:
Dr. Young, Tonja Riedy and William Rogers
Defendant:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann v. Hinkle et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Swann, Jr. and James Swann, Jr
Defendant:
Amy L. Hinkle, Jerry Beck, Emily Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vreeland v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Defendant:
Scott Dauffenbach, Adrienne Jacobson-Sanchez, CDOC Central Classification Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Delmart Vreeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wahl v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Kip Laury, Aaron Hofer, Corizon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chad L Wahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Si Futentes et al
as 2:2018cv00463
Plaintiff:
William Rogers
Defendant:
G. Miller, Philip Si Futentes and Kody Schur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Kwarteng et al
as 2:2018cv00421
Defendant:
John Doe, University Of Texas Medical Branch, M Goyel and others
Plaintiff:
William Rogers
Interested Party:
Edward Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElvine v. Beaver et al
as 3:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jenyon R. McElvine
Defendant:
Ken Beaver, Edwar Gazoo, William Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Walmart Home Office et al
as 8:2015cv00272
Defendant:
Amanda and Walmart Home Office
Plaintiff:
William Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Abbossi et al
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
William Roger Atkinson
Defendant:
Abbossi, Claiborne, Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
