Cases 1 - 10 of 75
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womble v. Barrows et al
as 4:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Mark Womble
Defendant:
K Barrows and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Casleberry v. David Ekwinife, et al
as 23-12384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EKWINIFE, BALDWIN SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN, BALDWIN STATE PRISON and others
CASLEBERRY v. EKWINIFE et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY
Defendant:
DOCTOR DAVID EKWINIFE, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN, REGINA WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Williamson et al
as 5:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Addarryl Jones and Tupac David Shakur
Defendant:
Terrance Dennis, Kelsie Williamson, FNU Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bence v. Womble et al
as 5:2021cv00558
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Bence
Defendant:
Chris M Boring, Micheal Womble, Susan K Meinders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womble v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2020cv00594
Defendant:
Lt. Davis, Amanda McGrew, Major Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Marty Womble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2020cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kelly Davis, Danny N/A, Stewart Jordan and others
Defendant:
Lt. Davis, Medical Staff, Amanda McGrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
