Cases 91 - 100 of 118
Gray v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04119
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gray
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Boonville Correctional Center, Billy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huerstel v. Schriro et al
as 2:2010cv00753
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bo Huerstel
Defendant:
Herb Haley, Richard Roe, William Woe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Howard Banks v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-10921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SGT. JOHN DOE, LT. JAMES DOE and others
Roe v. Cox et al
as 1:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Johnny Eugene Roe
Defendant:
Dale Cox, Rogers State Prison and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv01284
Plaintiff:
Howard Banks
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections, John Doe, James Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Demings
as 6:2009cv01567
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Roe
Defendant:
Jerry Demings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Anderson, The County of et al
as 6:2009cv02368
Plaintiff:
Jerry White
Defendant:
Anderson, The County of, Anderson County Detention Center, Garry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
KEARSE v. NOTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03628
Plaintiff:
RONDEL J. KEARSE
Defendant:
NOTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bishop vs. Richardson, et al
as 1:2008cv00689
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Bishop
Defendant:
Bill Richardson, Joe Williams, Gary King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MEUSA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03291
Plaintiff:
TROY A. MEUSA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
