Cases 111 - 120 of 896
Howard Tillman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BLAKE TILLMAN, named as Sir Howard Blake Tillman II
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, R. CARR, Deputy Warden, TEDESCO, Unknown: named as John and Jane Doe Tedesco, Correctional Officer II and others
Sandoval v. Does et al
as 1:2022cv03121
Plaintiff:
Thomas O. Sandoval
Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEE BRYANT
Defendant:
ANDREA FRANKLIN, CONSTANCE SCHMITT, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv50403
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Johnson, Bergami, A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, Jane Murphy, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv01331
Plaintiff:
Travis Clark
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe and HSM Weinman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Does
as 2:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Charlie Williams
Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windom v. Rivello et al
as 3:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
Roy Windom
Defendant:
John Rivello, George Little, Deputy Superintendent Koehler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Doe, et al
as 22-3201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, Regional Director, FBOP North Central Regional Office and JOHN OR JANE DOE, Remedy Clerk, FBOP North Central Regional Office
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
