Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hancock v. Chancellor et al
as 5:2017cv05018
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hancock
Defendant:
Blake Chancellor, John Doe Transport Detectives and John Doe Booking Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vartaurse Penns v. Carmen Brannon, et al
as 16-60162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VARTAURSE CORNELIOUS PENNS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMEN BRANNON, LIEUTENANT JAMES COBBS, B. THOMPSON and others
Lloyd et al v. Health South Nurses and Doctors et al
as 5:2015cv05261
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lee Lloyd
Defendant:
Health South Nurses and Doctors, Huber, Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2014cv00347
Defendant:
WILLIAM CARPENTER, GREG KEHL, UNKNOWN COUNTY JAIL BOOKING SUPERVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlon Goodwin v. Billy Barne
as 14-7003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON GOODWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY BARNES, Head Sheriff for Guilford County, KIM CARTER, Jailer and SERGEANT WOOD, Jailer
Defendant:
BRIAN BEASLEY, Assistant District Attorney, ROBIN WORTH, CAPTAIN REID and others
Daniel Vesley v. Darnley Hodge, Sr.
as 09-7859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DARNLEY HODGE, SR., Superintendent, Individually and in his official capacity, RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, LANGLEY, Captain, Chief of Security, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant - None:
DOCTOR ROSTAFINSKI, Jail Psychiatrist, Individually and in his official capacity
Barrett v. Cole et al
as 5:2008cv05155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Barrett
Defendant:
Nancy Cole, John Doe Booking Officer, Hunter Petray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. Jane Doe Nurse et al
as 5:2007cv05233
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
Jane Doe Nurse, John Doe Booking Officer, Greg Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
