Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Dawkins v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Allen M. Dawkins
Defendant:
Elias Diggins, Lovato, Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01630
Defendant:
I and I, Alabama Department of Corrections, M. C. Dawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00743
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Randall Sandlin, Staff Attorneys and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. Ransom et al
as 3:2020cv01467
Defendant:
Paul Mooney, John Doe, Kevin Ransom and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Love Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins #113242 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Wendy Orm, A Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Rashaun Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez #242516 et al v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Mada, Michael Ross, Anthony Pretto and others
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Wendy Eccles, Wendy Orm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 20-6649
Defendant / Appellee:
D. GOODE, G. MILITANA, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DR. L. WANG, Physician, LESLIE S. GREEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Johnson v. United States et al
as 4:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Mitchell, United States, John Kitchens and others
Plaintiff:
Charla Lynn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. Samuel
as 1:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dawkins and Jon Black
Defendant:
Officer Shantel Samuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Henck et al
as 3:2018cv01475
Defendant:
Warden Hodgson and M. Henck
Plaintiff:
Antonious Wilder and Larry Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
