Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Lunsford v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023ct03126
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of North Carolina and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. KOENIG et al
as 1:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
ALEXHANDER KOENIG, BRUMFIEL, LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Marlowe Everett Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Randy Smith, Jared Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhn v. Bilbrey et al
as 5:2023cv05026
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Kuhn
Defendant:
Deputy Bilbrey, Deputy Phipps, Corporal Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Defendant:
SAMMY JOSEPH, MYERS, PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. NC Department of Corrections
as 5:2022ct03384
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
NC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
TONY LIONEL LOVE
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JOSEPH, SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
DURELL T. CRAIN
Defendant:
SEVIER, FRENCH, PAIGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, LEONARD BAKER, ZACK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
