Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Logan v. Ramsey et al
as 3:2018cv03002
Plaintiff:
Torey Brett Logan
Defendant:
Dale Ramsey, Robert Allen, Scott Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03701
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office, St. Tammany Parish Jail, St. Tammany Parish Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Bond County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Bond County Jail, Jeff Brown and Bond County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILL v. SHERIFF OF HOWARD COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv03152
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN DILL
Defendant:
HOWARD COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, STEVE ROGERS and SHERIFF OF HOWARD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07685
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raiford v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Raiford
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, County of Forrest, Mississippi, Betty Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07187
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WARDEN OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Baker v. County of Missaukee, et al
as 16-2294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MISSAUKEE, SOTERO M. URETA, Dr., M.D., JAMES D. BOSSCHER, Sheriff and others
Robert Allen v. Partha Ghosh, et al
as 16-1617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHA GHOSH, Doctor, LIPING ZHANG, Doctor, IMHOTEP CARTER and others
Robert Allen v. Partha Ghosh, et al
as 16-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHA GHOSH, LIPING ZHANG, IMHOTEP CARTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
