Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Poole v. Aguinaldo et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Defendant:
E. Aguinaldo, Jr., C/O Norman, Randy Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Pfister et al
as 1:2019cv08071
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, John Daley, Randy Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Trolus Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUITT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00164
Defendant:
PEREZ, OMAR AHMAD, DIVISION OF CLINICAL HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sankara v. Searls et al
as 1:2019cv02766
Defendant:
Fernando, Medical Doctor, Jeffrey Searls and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sankara v. ICE Police Officer Immigration
as 18-2198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ahmadou Sankara
Defendant - Appellee:
ICE Police Officer Immigration and Hon. Alen Page, Immigration Judge
Gill v. Deal et al
as 5:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashad Gill
Defendant:
James Deal, Edwina Johnson, Taran Todman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmad v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv02127
Plaintiff:
Ahmad A. Ahmad
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cermak Health Services, C/O Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv05127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Tim Thrasher, Eric Harting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sankara v. Brown
as 17-3556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ahmadou Sankara
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Plasket, Department of Corrections,, Department of Corrections Officer, in Mail Room (outgoing mail), et al, Department of Corrections During Search and others
Defendant:
Maxsolaine Mingo, Williams, Officer, Doctor) Ali and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
