Cases 31 - 40 of 316
Hodgson v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Hodgson
Defendant:
Bobby Dunbar and Class D Coordinator Neil Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elms v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cody Lee Elms
Defendant:
Bobby Dunbar and Class D Coordinator Neil Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodgson v. Dunbar et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Hodgson
Defendant:
Jailer Bobby Dunbar and Class D Coordinator Neil Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elms v. Dunbar et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cody Lee Elms
Defendant:
Jailer Bobby Dunbar and Class D Coordinator Neil Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Izeh v. Rose et al
as 1:2022cv09828
Plaintiff:
Izeh Matthew and Matthew Izeh
Defendant:
Judge Neil Rose, Christopher Dez, Defendant Attorney Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Freeman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director at ADOCRR, J MACADOREY, Complex Warden, D QUINTERO, Deputy Warden at Cibola, Yuma and others
Freeman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Macadorey, D Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Gentile et al
as 8:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
William Parrish
Defendant:
Neil Gentile and Steven Derolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. McKeown et al
as 5:2022cv02484
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Walker
Defendant:
Director Neil McKeown, Union County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glass v. Byrd
as 2:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glass
Defendant:
Neil Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
