Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Burns v. Chandler et al
as 2:2009cv01599
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Burns
Defendant:
Kristin Chandler, Kristin Schumacher, Kathy Van Olst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 09-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Luh v. Missouri, State of et al
as 5:2008cv06088
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Mary Attebury, James Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALSTON v. WARDEN PREBISH et al
as 3:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DOUGLAS ALSTON
Defendant:
WARDEN PREBISH, C.O. STONER and MARY BETH SHAFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill Finklea Detention Senter et al
as 3:2007cv03618
Plaintiff:
Maurice Savalia Johnson
Defendant:
Hill Finklea Detention Senter, Collins and Doctor Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Shafer v. Snook
as 07-6833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY I. SNOOK, President for Washington County Commissioners, PAULA PRICE, Washington County Adult Protective Services Agent, SUPERVISOR, (Paula's) and others
Shafer v. Price
as 07-6532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAULA PRICE, CINDY DIAMOND, DSS/APS and others
Shafer v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2007cv04068
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Central Division Prosecutor and Anthony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. Knox et al
as 2:2007cv04070
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
William A Knox and Anthony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2007cv04069
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
U.S. Government and William A Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
