Cases 41 - 50 of 2,635
Mobery v. Sissytrunk
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Mobery
Defendant:
Brady Sissytrunk
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. Matthew
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cage
Defendant:
Kerry Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fasold v. Blount County Jail
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Isiah Matthew Fasold
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blango v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Blango
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Juwan Matthews v. Kevin Pitzen, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
JUWAN T. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
KEVIN W. PITZEN, Captain, DEAN FABRY, Correctional Officer, JONATHAN BOHNSACK, Correctional Officer and others
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03033
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Corrections Corporation of America, Sam Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Richey R. Farmer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURRITT v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURRITT
Defendant:
EMERSON, AMY ROLLINGS and DAWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
