Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Allen v. Allen et al
as 1:2014cv04126
Plaintiff:
Shay Lamont Allen
Defendant:
Allen, Janet Singleton and Jeffrey Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY ALTON DIAMOND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Rutledge State Prison, SHAY HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Lyons et al
as 1:2013cv06523
Plaintiff:
Simon A. Lee
Defendant:
Shay Lyons, Rose Brown, Kiesha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessica Walker v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 13-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, PAUL LAIRD, North Central Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, TERRY MEAD, Administrator Camp, FCI Greenville and others
Charles Winston v. Yolanda Clark, et al
as 13-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles A. Winston
Defendant - Appellee:
Yolanda Clark, Captain, Varner Unit, ADC, Joyce Jackson, Kitchen Supervisor, Varner Unit, ADC, Kay Skillen, Dietitian, Arkasas Department of Correction and others
Holmes et al v. Hall et al
as 5:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mandrick Holmes and Shay Humphrey
Defendant:
David Hall and K Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Clark et al
as 5:2012cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles A Winston
Defendant:
Yolonda Clark, Joyce Jackson, Kay Skillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shai v. Dickinson
as 5:2010cv04131
Plaintiff:
Alkebu-Lan Shai
Defendant:
K. Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ODOM v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv01079
Plaintiff:
SHAY ROBERT ODOM
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Trenkler et al
as 6:2008cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Alfred Trenkler and Thomas L Shay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
