Cases 61 - 70 of 195
Mann v. Crumpton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Officer Ricks, Sgt. Crumpton, Officer Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jason Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Ara-Mark, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Amanda Durrett, Randy Ingram, Connie Helton and others
Plaintiff:
John Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Mann et al
as 1:2018cv05881
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeffery Mann and DeKalb County
Plaintiff:
Louis Timothy Eberhardt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv01036
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Warden Estes, Susan Moncrief and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jason Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2018cv03611
Defendant:
BEGUHN, OWENS, PAGE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Mann et al
as 5:2018ct03347
Plaintiff:
Jameela Leonard
Defendant:
Dr. Ralph Newman and Dr. Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. MARTOCCIA et al
as 1:2018cv02319
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH, DONALD G. DOWDEN, SEAN G. GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
MATT MYERS, ALL EMPLOYED OFFICERS and JOHN MARTOCCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv01668
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL, KITCHEN STAFF and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff:
JOEY LAMONT MANNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv01609
Defendant:
MARRISA FISHER, MARTOCCIA and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff:
JOEY MANNS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2018cv00176
Defendant:
"SECOND IN CHARGE" SHU, LARRY ALLEN, K. ARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Currently Unknown:
SHU LT.
John Does #1- #10 Names Currently Unknown:
SHU OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
