Cases 61 - 70 of 4,269
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Danny Hooper v. Roosevelt Barden
as 24-1783
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Hooper
Defendant:
Roosevelt Barden, Captain Shift Supervisor, EARU
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vidrio Fuentes v. Nurse Kelly et al
as 9:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Vidrio Fuentes
Defendant:
Nurse Kelly and Captain Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosqueda v. Captain Hash et al
as 9:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jose Mosqueda
Defendant:
Captain Hash, Nurse Gabby, Nurse Kelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. McCormick et al
as 6:2024cv06052
Plaintiff:
John Paul Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff McCormick, Chief Deputy Elrod, Captain Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eglaus, Assony v. Captain Lyons et al
as 2:2024cv14109
Plaintiff:
Assony Eglaus
Defendant:
Captain Lyons, Sergeant Phillips, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Breyan v. Thomas Commander
as 24-6320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BREYAN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS COMMANDER, A/W KENNETH SHARP and WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
