Cases 61 - 70 of 816
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Staniec et al
as 2:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels and Remo H Daniels
Defendant:
Jeremy L Staniec, Dr Brook A Lewis, Robert Rymarkewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scarbrough v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joe Scarbrough
Defendant:
Unknown Hawthorn and Harrison County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Harrison County Adult Center
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Richard Dale Meyers
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Eilers et al
as 3:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Willie James Harrison
Defendant:
Eilers, M Lively, Tyler King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv06710
Plaintiff:
Willie J Harrison
Defendant:
Kim Young, Joanna Sted, McNally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01172
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lemons
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Sean Edwards
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
Christopher McDonald
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Laron Evans
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
