Cases 71 - 80 of 3,651
Poore v. Lammer et al
as 3:2024cv50115
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Poore
Defendant:
Brian Lammer, Jenkins, Borden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Wise
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Miller
Defendant:
J. Wise and T. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peter Seymour, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Miller, C.O. James Schonmann, Daniel Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaquille Parker v. Deandrea Pugh, et al
as 24-10861
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE PARKER
Defendant:
DEANDREA PUGH, EBONY COLEMAN, LESTER MURRAY and others
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klask v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brenda Klask
Defendant:
CO K. Miller, Sheriff Carmine Marceno, Lieutenant V. Amoroso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
WILLIS ARMANDO MILLER
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
