Cases 71 - 80 of 161
Antonio Sustaita v. Kevin Nolan, et al
as 16-3103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO SUSTAITA
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN P. NOLAN, Douglas County States Attorney, CHARLES E. MCGREW, HOWARD CLINT and others
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, Lucy Burciaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barroca v. Maye, et al
as 16-3080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BARROCA
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, (FNU) JOHNSON, MARY NOLAN and others
Horton v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Tony L Horton
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sherman Antwan Broadhead
Defendant:
Kendrick Boyd, Paul Sanders, Michael T. Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Sawar
as 3:2015cv01386
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Nolan
Defendant:
Amar Sawar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Raines v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2015cv02089
Plaintiff:
Todd Raines
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Hawaii Department of Public Safety, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. South Carolina Department Corrections et al
as 9:2015cv03692
Plaintiff:
Altony Brooks
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lee Correctional Institution, Bryan Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan Edwards v. USA
as 15-13548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOLAN NATHANIEL EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
