Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HARRISON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD HARRISON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON, KURT SUESSER, PAUL BROCKLEHURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disability Rights South Carolina v. Richland County
as 8:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights South Carolina, A.C., J.H. and others
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Millen v. San Quentin State Prison et al
as 3:2019cv03986
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Millen
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison, Chief Psychologist Nelson, A.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cramer v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01700
Plaintiff:
James A. Cramer
Defendant:
Laurie Smith, S. Kernan, C. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00862
Plaintiff:
George Rutledge
Defendant:
William Bell, A.C. Roper, Cathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yearby v. Box et al
as 3:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Toric Lavern Yearby
Defendant:
Heith Box, A.C Box, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Watson et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gary
Defendant:
B Watson, J.R. Townsend, E.S. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. All of the doctors and physicians assistant that dealt with my issues up to date John and Jean Dows.
as 1:2011cv06716
Plaintiff:
A.C. Williams
Defendant:
All of the doctors and physicians assistant that dealt with my issues up to date John and Jean Dows.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Sayre et al
as 2:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Mailliard L. King
Defendant:
M. C. Sayre, Cheryl Malo-Clines and A.C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00631
Plaintiff:
Louis A.C. McClendon
Defendant:
Gillis Brown, Eric Morris, Unknown Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
