Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Williams v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Quentrell Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Martin E Hoffman, Brandon P Mason and Brandi R Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. South Mississippi Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Timothy Barnes, South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Georgia Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Quentrell v. Haure, M
as 3:2018cv00730
Plaintiff:
Quentrell Eugene Williams
Defendant:
M. Haure
Undetermined:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Greer v. Brian Neel, et al
as 18-10604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE WILLIAM GREER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN NEEL, LAURA FLETCHER, YOUNG and others
Williams v. Dunning et al
as 3:2017cv00542
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Dunning, Todd County Detention Center and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunning et al
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Dunning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREER v. NEEL et al
as 5:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WILLIAM GREER
Defendant:
NEEL, LAURA FLETCHER, YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SEAN P. KILKENNY, DEPUTY JOHN DOE (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv04595
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JULIO M. ALGARIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
