Cases 1 - 10 of 31
De La Miya v. Division Judges 14th Judicial District Courts et al
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Kerry Salas De La Miya
Defendant:
Division Judges 14th Judicial District Courts, Warden Nugent, Tony Mancuso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Williams
Defendant:
Warren Hubbard, Troy Peterson and Terri Robertson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Unicoi County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00139
Defendant:
Barbra Scalf, Kenny Jones, Darrel Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mr. Pete et al
as 1:2014cv09842
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Williams
Defendant:
Mr. Pete, Eary Delray and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. Williams
as 1:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jesse Trujillo
Defendant:
Joe Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinzo v. State of N.M. Dept. of Corr., et al
as 13-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES HINZO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE TAPIA, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Trujillo v. Williams, et al
as 11-2177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE TRUJILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE WILLIAMS, Secretary and ELMER BUSTOS, Director New Mexico Dept. of Corrections
Dass v. Doe No 1 et al
as 4:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Viraj Dass
Defendant:
John Doe No 1, Thomas Webster, Joe Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Spruel v. Roger Weld, et al
as 11-30113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SPRUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WELD, CORY WHALEY, JOHN THOMPSON and others
Fawley v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Benjamin William Fawley
Defendant:
Joe Williams, Anthony Romero, Jai R. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
