Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Henry Holmes v. Michael Veith, et al
as 22-3263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Defendant:
D. CORBETT, ROBERT EVANCHICK, ROBERT FORMAN and others
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR., ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Flores v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00564
Defendant:
David Jendusa, Pima County Adult Detention, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Lopez-Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03329
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Medina
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carranza v. Lewis et al
as 4:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Carranza
Defendant:
G. Lewis, Matthew Cate, P. T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Azuna v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01475
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Lopez-Azuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arias v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00852
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Arias
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escobedo v. Jasper County Jail et al
as 3:2013cv05078
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Escobedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Castillo-Arroyo v. Alec Niziolek, et al
as 12-15126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL CASTILLO-ARROYO
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEC NIZIOLEK, Assistant Chief Counsel, JAMES DEVITTO, Immigration Judge and ICE HOMELAND SECURITY, Named as "DHS/ICE Chief Counsel Office"
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
