Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
MILLER v. NICKLES et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, DEPUTY WARDEN SHAWN EDMUNSON, LT MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
NIHEIM MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv02655
Plaintiff:
ANTWAUN FREEMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAMS, CHIEF LEECH, LT. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. MOORE et al
as 2:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
ANTWAUN FREEMAN
Defendant:
LT MOORE, SGT BRYANT and CO BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Harrison
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Anthony Wills, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Hagan et al
as 1:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
Bobby Germaine Shields
Defendant:
Jason Hagan, Judge Anthony Tarnacki, Corporal Jane Czajkoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 5:2019ct03292
Defendant:
C/O Brooks, Cpt. Moore, Lt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 2:2019cv01971
Defendant:
DR. PHILLIPS, C/O BAGWELL, C/O CAMPAGNA and others
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Lt. Moore, Commander Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
