Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Severiano-Nava v. Sheridan Correctional Center Doctor et al
as 1:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
Giobel Severiano-Nava
Defendant:
Sheridan Correctional Center Doctor, Director of Nurses, [Don] and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Caldwell v. Bowers et al
as 6:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
Samuel Walter Caldwell
Defendant:
Deputy Director Syrna Bowers, MEDICAL SERVICES MGR Dana Haynes, RN Kelly Aunspaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nava v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2018cv01734
Defendant:
Snohomish County Jail and Sweeney
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Nava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navas v. JPCC/Correct Health et al
as 2:2018cv06846
Defendant:
Julio Alvarado, Sky Noble, District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alberto Monterroso Navas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Moore v. Don Bishoff, et al
as 17-17385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY AARON MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
DON BISHOFF, Director, M.C.A.D.F, COX, First Name Unknown, Lt. Administration M.C.A.D.F., NAVA, First Name Unknown, Cpl. Security M.C.A.D.F. and others
Moore v. Bishoff et al
as 3:2017cv08188
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore
Defendant:
Don Bishoff, Unknown Cox, Unknown Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harris et al
as 4:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Defendant:
A W Harris, Unknown Nava, Unknown Johannes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nava v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv03435
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Javier Nava
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nava-Nonez v. Durango Jail Facility et al
as 2:2014cv01579
Plaintiff:
Agustin Nava-Nonez
Defendant:
Durango Jail Facility and Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
