Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Nathan T Lee and Nathan Thomas Lee
Defendant:
Sgt Smith and (SCDC) South Carolina Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Charles Tooker v. T Mak, et al
as 22-16123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TOOKER
Defendant / Appellee:
T MAK, LT. Senior Hearing Officer, M DEVERICK, Correctional Lieutenant and T LEE, Captain
Freeman v. Zona et al
as 3:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman
Defendant:
J. Zona, T. Lee and Other Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Governor, State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv14254
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lee
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Zona et al
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman
Defendant:
J. Zona, T. Lee, Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lees v. Towers Jail et al
as 2:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
Joseph T Lees
Defendant:
Towers Jail, Lower Buckeye Jail, Maricopa County Towers Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv07136
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, J. Stout, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Story v. Daniels et al
as 4:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Story
Defendant:
T Lee, Pierce and C Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tooker v. Mak et al
as 5:2020cv07373
Defendant:
M Deverick, Captain T Lee and Lt. T Mak
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Tooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
