Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2020cv09479
Defendant:
Mona Houston, Ron Davis, Louie Escobell and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swindell v. Hunter et al
as 3:2015cv01532
Plaintiff:
Justin E. Swindell
Defendant:
Mark A. Hunter, Michael S. Hegenauer, Troy Allen Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. WRIGHT et al.
as 5:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
TROY ALLEN BARNES
Defendant:
WILLIAM WRIGHT, SHAD REDMON, JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Judge William Wright et al
as 3:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Troy Allen Barnes
Defendant:
Judge William Wright, State Attorney, Shad Redmon, Jackson County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Tucker v. Doc Holladay, et al
as 13-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Troy Allen Tucker
Defendant:
Joseph Buckman, Dr., St. Vincent Hospital, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Williams, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Doc Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County; originally sued as Doc Holiday, Carl Johnson, Dr., Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Catherine Smith, Nurse, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; originally sued as C. Smith and others
Bennett v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al
as 2:2010cv03295
Plaintiff:
Troy Allen Bennett
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center and Bogalusa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Buckman et al
as 4:2010cv00749
Plaintiff:
Troy Allen Tucker
Defendant:
Joseph Buckman, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. South Carolina Department of Corrections Industries et al
as 4:2008cv03244
Plaintiff:
Brantley Troy Allen
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections Industries and Judy Bracken
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
