Cases 261 - 270 of 832,581
BROADCAST MISIC, INC et al v. Dr. Livingston's Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MISIC, INC, RICK SPRINGFIELD MUSIC, WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING CORP and others
Defendant:
Dr. Livingston's Inc., Nicholas N. Peterson and Michael E. Zdunski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
FARAFONOV v. TURNER
as 1:2024cv01113
Petitioner:
ANDREI FARAFONOV
Respondent:
MIKHAIL TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Court v. Future Motion INC
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Todd Court
Defendant:
Future Motion INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Shane J Hardymon and Shane Hardymon
Defendant:
Scott Kent, Michael P. Davis, Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bain v. Vargas et al
as 0:2024cv61172
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bain
Defendant:
Jose Vargas and Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
